<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- RSS generated by feedland v0.6.43 on Wed, 25 Sep 2024 13:45:54 GMT -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:source="http://source.scripting.com/">
	<channel>
		<title>My Feed</title>
		<link>https://blue.feedland.org/?river=http://data.feedland.org/blue/feeds/timobres.xml</link>
		<description>It's just a feed for now</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 13:45:55 GMT</pubDate>
		<generator>feedland v0.6.43</generator>
		<docs>https://cyber.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html</docs>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 13:45:54 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<cloud domain="rpc.rsscloud.io" port="5337" path="/pleaseNotify" registerProcedure="" protocol="http-post" />
		<source:cloud>http://rpc.rsscloud.io:5337/pleaseNotify</source:cloud>
		<source:localTime>Wed, September 25, 2024 9:45 AM EDT</source:localTime>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Google, third largest cloud provider, gripes that MSFT, second largest, prices Windows Server (hugely successful product) much higher if customer uses Google not MSF cloud. EU complaint. Interesting issues about role of cloud vs existing s/w.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Amazon and Google both entered cloud as unimportant vendors of other s/w to enterprise.  Amazon added many facilities that compete with existing vendors, e.g. in database.  Google is an important consumer computing firm, enterprise not so much.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Cloud services provided valuable competition against existing vendors, but tight ties to vendor s/w suggest movement toward cloud as one more layer in proprietary stack.   &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Interesting case!  Google-eye view here. at &lt;a href=&quot;https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/inside-google-cloud/filing-eu-complaint-against-microsoft-licensing/&quot;&gt;https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/inside-google-cloud/filing-eu-complaint-against-microsoft-licensing/&lt;/a&gt;   Anybody seen MSFT view?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 13:45:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>https://blue.feedland.org/?item=632491</link>
			<guid>https://blue.feedland.org/?item=632491</guid>
			<source:markdown>Google, third largest cloud provider, gripes that MSFT, second largest, prices Windows Server (hugely successful product) much higher if customer uses Google not MSF cloud. EU complaint. Interesting issues about role of cloud vs existing s/w.&#10;&#10;Amazon and Google both entered cloud as unimportant vendors of other s/w to enterprise.  Amazon added many facilities that compete with existing vendors, e.g. in database.  Google is an important consumer computing firm, enterprise not so much.&#10;&#10;Cloud services provided valuable competition against existing vendors, but tight ties to vendor s/w suggest movement toward cloud as one more layer in proprietary stack.&#10;&#10;Interesting case!  Google-eye view here. at https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/inside-google-cloud/filing-eu-complaint-against-microsoft-licensing/   Anybody seen MSFT view?</source:markdown>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Google, third largest cloud provider, gripes that MSFT, second largest, prices Windows Server (hugely successful product) much higher if customer uses Google not MSF cloud. EU complaint. Interesting issues about role of cloud vs existing s/w.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Amazon and Google both entered cloud as unimportant vendors of other s/w to enterprise.  Amazon added many facilities that compete with existing vendors, e.g. in database.  Google is an important consumer computing firm, enterprise not so much.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Cloud services provided valuable competition against existing vendors, but tight ties to vendor s/w suggest movement toward cloud as one more layer in proprietary stack.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Interesting case!  Google-eye view here. at &lt;a href=&quot;https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/inside-google-cloud/filing-eu-complaint-against-microsoft-licensing/&quot;&gt;https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/inside-google-cloud/filing-eu-complaint-against-microsoft-licensing/&lt;/a&gt;   Anybody seen MSFT view?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 13:43:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>https://blue.feedland.org/?item=632487</link>
			<guid>https://blue.feedland.org/?item=632487</guid>
			<source:markdown>Google, third largest cloud provider, gripes that MSFT, second largest, prices Windows Server (hugely successful product) much higher if customer uses Google not MSF cloud. EU complaint. Interesting issues about role of cloud vs existing s/w.&#10;&#10;Amazon and Google both entered cloud as unimportant vendors of other s/w to enterprise.  Amazon added many facilities that compete with existing vendors, e.g. in database.  Google is an important consumer computing firm, enterprise not so much.&#10;&#10;Cloud services provided valuable competition against existing vendors, but tight ties to vendor s/w suggest movement toward cloud as one more layer in proprietary stack.&#10;&#10;Interesting case!  Google-eye view here. at https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/inside-google-cloud/filing-eu-complaint-against-microsoft-licensing/   Anybody seen MSFT view?</source:markdown>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>
