My Feed

My Feed https://blue.feedland.org/?river=http://data.feedland.org/blue/feeds/paulsander.xml It's just a feed for now Mon, 07 Oct 2024 10:52:02 GMT feedland v0.6.43 https://cyber.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html Mon, 07 Oct 2024 10:52:02 GMT http://rpc.rsscloud.io:5337/pleaseNotify Mon, October 7, 2024 6:52 AM EDT <p>A new symposium on my OA book 'The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law' (Hart '22) is now published online first on Revus. I'm grateful to the editors for hosting it and to the contributors for their fantastic comments. A brief thread:</p> <p>In '<a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10044">The State and legal otherness'</a>, Donald Bello Hutt wonders if my criticism of Hobbes is misguided and discusses the relationship between the idea of the state and that of the rule of law. Is it an essential relationship? </p> <p>In <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10130">'Legal constitutionalism and the Ius/Lex distinction</a>', Mathieu Carpentier engages with the distinction between lex and ius I develop in TMCD and wonders if it runs against the account of constitutionalism I develop therein.</p> <p>In <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9898">'Normative power and The Making of Constitutional Democracy'</a>, Maris Köpcke questions the internal consistency of the account of normative powers in the book and its compatibility with the theory of constitutional democracy.</p> <p>Finally, in '<a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10021">What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?</a>' Graziella Romeo takes the cue from constitutionalism as 'legal otherness' to highlight the role of traditions and contingency in constitutional thinking.</p> <p>I attempt to engage with the many criticisms and comments in my reply, <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10375">'Making and re-making the theory of constitutional democracy: further observations</a>', where I develop further several of the theses in TMCD. </p> <p>The entire symposium can be found <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9999">here</a> and the book can be freely downloaded <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4562656">here</a>. /end</p> Mon, 07 Oct 2024 10:52:02 GMT https://blue.feedland.org/?item=653203 https://blue.feedland.org/?item=653203 A new symposium on my OA book 'The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law' (Hart '22) is now published online first on Revus. I'm grateful to the editors for hosting it and to the contributors for their fantastic comments. A brief thread: In '[The State and legal otherness'](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10044), Donald Bello Hutt wonders if my criticism of Hobbes is misguided and discusses the relationship between the idea of the state and that of the rule of law. Is it an essential relationship? In ['Legal constitutionalism and the Ius/Lex distinction](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10130)', Mathieu Carpentier engages with the distinction between lex and ius I develop in TMCD and wonders if it runs against the account of constitutionalism I develop therein. In ['Normative power and The Making of Constitutional Democracy'](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9898), Maris Köpcke questions the internal consistency of the account of normative powers in the book and its compatibility with the theory of constitutional democracy. Finally, in '[What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10021)' Graziella Romeo takes the cue from constitutionalism as 'legal otherness' to highlight the role of traditions and contingency in constitutional thinking. I attempt to engage with the many criticisms and comments in my reply, ['Making and re-making the theory of constitutional democracy: further observations](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10375)', where I develop further several of the theses in TMCD. The entire symposium can be found [here](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9999) and the book can be freely downloaded [here](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4562656). /end <p>A new symposium on my OA book 'The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law' (Hart '22) is now published online first on Revus. I'm grateful to the editors for hosting it and to the contributors for their fantastic comments. A brief thread:</p> <p>In '<a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10044">The State and legal otherness'</a>, Donald Bello Hutt wonders if my criticism of Hobbes is misguided and discusses the relationship between the idea of the state and that of the rule of law. Is it an essential relationship?</p> <p>In <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10130">'Legal constitutionalism and the Ius/Lex distinction</a>', Mathieu Carpentier engages with the distinction between lex and ius I develop in TMCD and wonders if it runs against the account of constitutionalism I develop therein.</p> <p>In <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9898">'Normative power and The Making of Constitutional Democracy'</a>, Maris Köpcke questions the internal consistency of the account of normative powers in the book and its compatibility with the theory of constitutional democracy.</p> <p>Finally, in '<a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10021">What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?</a>' Graziella Romeo takes the cue from constitutionalism as 'legal otherness' to highlight the role of traditions and contingency in constitutional thinking.</p> <p>I attempt to engage with the many criticisms and comments in my reply, <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10375">'Making and re-making the theory of constitutional democracy: further observations</a>', where I develop further several of the theses in TMCD.</p> <p>The entire symposium can be found <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9999">here</a> and the book can be freely downloaded <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4562656">here</a>. /end</p> Mon, 07 Oct 2024 10:50:19 GMT https://blue.feedland.org/?item=653202 https://blue.feedland.org/?item=653202 A new symposium on my OA book 'The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law' (Hart '22) is now published online first on Revus. I'm grateful to the editors for hosting it and to the contributors for their fantastic comments. A brief thread: In '[The State and legal otherness'](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10044), Donald Bello Hutt wonders if my criticism of Hobbes is misguided and discusses the relationship between the idea of the state and that of the rule of law. Is it an essential relationship? In ['Legal constitutionalism and the Ius/Lex distinction](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10130)', Mathieu Carpentier engages with the distinction between lex and ius I develop in TMCD and wonders if it runs against the account of constitutionalism I develop therein. In ['Normative power and The Making of Constitutional Democracy'](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9898), Maris Köpcke questions the internal consistency of the account of normative powers in the book and its compatibility with the theory of constitutional democracy. Finally, in '[What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10021)' Graziella Romeo takes the cue from constitutionalism as 'legal otherness' to highlight the role of traditions and contingency in constitutional thinking. I attempt to engage with the many criticisms and comments in my reply, ['Making and re-making the theory of constitutional democracy: further observations](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10375)', where I develop further several of the theses in TMCD. The entire symposium can be found [here](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9999) and the book can be freely downloaded [here](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4562656). /end <p>A new symposium on my OA book 'The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law' (Hart '22) is now published online first on Revus. I'm grateful to the editors for hosting it and to the contributors for their fantastic comments. A brief thread:</p> <p>In '<a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10044">The State and legal otherness'</a>, Donald Bello Hutt wonders if my criticism of Hobbes is misguided and discusses the relationship between the idea of the state and that of the rule of law. Is it an essential relationship?</p> <p>In <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10130">'Legal constitutionalism and the Ius/Lex distinction</a>', Mathieu Carpentier engages with the distinction between lex and ius I develop in TMCD and wonders if it runs against the account of constitutionalism I develop therein.</p> <p>In <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9898">'Normative power and The Making of Constitutional Democracy'</a>, Maris Köpcke questions the internal consistency of the account of normative powers in the book and its compatibility with the theory of constitutional democracy.</p> <p>Finally, in '<a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10021">What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?</a>' Graziella Romeo takes the cue from constitutionalism as 'legal otherness' to highlight the role of traditions and contingency in constitutional thinking.</p> <p>I attempt to engage with the many criticisms and comments in my reply, <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10375">'Making and re-making the theory of constitutional democracy: further observations</a>', where I develop further several of the theses in TMCD.</p> <p>The entire symposium can be found <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9999">here</a> and the book can be freely downloaded <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4562656">here</a>. /end</p> Mon, 07 Oct 2024 10:48:13 GMT https://blue.feedland.org/?item=653200 https://blue.feedland.org/?item=653200 A new symposium on my OA book 'The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law' (Hart '22) is now published online first on Revus. I'm grateful to the editors for hosting it and to the contributors for their fantastic comments. A brief thread: In '[The State and legal otherness'](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10044), Donald Bello Hutt wonders if my criticism of Hobbes is misguided and discusses the relationship between the idea of the state and that of the rule of law. Is it an essential relationship? In ['Legal constitutionalism and the Ius/Lex distinction](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10130)', Mathieu Carpentier engages with the distinction between lex and ius I develop in TMCD and wonders if it runs against the account of constitutionalism I develop therein. In ['Normative power and The Making of Constitutional Democracy'](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9898), Maris Köpcke questions the internal consistency of the account of normative powers in the book and its compatibility with the theory of constitutional democracy. Finally, in '[What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10021)' Graziella Romeo takes the cue from constitutionalism as 'legal otherness' to highlight the role of traditions and contingency in constitutional thinking. I attempt to engage with the many criticisms and comments in my reply, ['Making and re-making the theory of constitutional democracy: further observations](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10375)', where I develop further several of the theses in TMCD. The entire symposium can be found [here](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9999) and the book can be freely downloaded [here](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4562656). /end <p>A new symposium on my OA book 'The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law' (Hart '22) is now published online first on Revus. I'm grateful to the editors for hosting it and to the contributors for their fantastic comments. A brief thread:</p> <p>In '<a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10044">The State and legal otherness'</a>, Donald Bello Hutt wonders if my criticism of Hobbes is misguided and discusses the relationship between the idea of the state and that of the rule of law. Is it an essential relationship?</p> <p>In <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10130">'Legal constitutionalism and the Ius/Lex distinction</a>', Mathieu Carpentier engages with the distinction between lex and ius I develop in TMCD and wonders if it runs against the account of constitutionalism I develop therein.</p> <p>In <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9898">'Normative power and The Making of Constitutional Democracy'</a>, Maris Köpcke questions the internal consistency of the account of normative powers in the book and its compatibility with the theory of constitutional democracy.</p> <p>Finally, in '<a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10021">What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?</a>' Graziella Romeo takes the cue from constitutionalism as 'legal otherness' to highlight the role of traditions and contingency in constitutional thinking.</p> <p>I attempt to engage with the many criticisms and comments in my reply, <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10375">'Making and re-making the theory of constitutional democracy: further observations</a>', where I develop further several of the theses in TMCD.</p> <p>The entire symposium can be found <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9999">here</a> and the book can be freely downloaded <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4562656">here</a>. /end</p> Mon, 07 Oct 2024 10:46:18 GMT https://blue.feedland.org/?item=653198 https://blue.feedland.org/?item=653198 A new symposium on my OA book 'The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law' (Hart '22) is now published online first on Revus. I'm grateful to the editors for hosting it and to the contributors for their fantastic comments. A brief thread: In '[The State and legal otherness'](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10044), Donald Bello Hutt wonders if my criticism of Hobbes is misguided and discusses the relationship between the idea of the state and that of the rule of law. Is it an essential relationship? In ['Legal constitutionalism and the Ius/Lex distinction](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10130)', Mathieu Carpentier engages with the distinction between lex and ius I develop in TMCD and wonders if it runs against the account of constitutionalism I develop therein. In ['Normative power and The Making of Constitutional Democracy'](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9898), Maris Köpcke questions the internal consistency of the account of normative powers in the book and its compatibility with the theory of constitutional democracy. Finally, in '[What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10021)' Graziella Romeo takes the cue from constitutionalism as 'legal otherness' to highlight the role of traditions and contingency in constitutional thinking. I attempt to engage with the many criticisms and comments in my reply, ['Making and re-making the theory of constitutional democracy: further observations](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10375)', where I develop further several of the theses in TMCD. The entire symposium can be found [here](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9999) and the book can be freely downloaded [here](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4562656). /end <p>A new symposium on my OA book 'The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law' (Hart '22) is now published online first on Revus. I'm grateful to the editors for hosting it and to the contributors for their fantastic comments. A brief thread:</p> <p>In '<a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10044">The State and legal otherness'</a>, Donald Bello Hutt wonders if my criticism of Hobbes is misguided and discusses the relationship between the idea of the state and that of the rule of law. Is it an essential relationship?</p> <p>In <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10130">'Legal constitutionalism and the Ius/Lex distinction</a>', Mathieu Carpentier engages with the distinction between lex and ius I develop in TMCD and wonders if it runs against the account of constitutionalism I develop therein.</p> <p>In <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9898">'Normative power and The Making of Constitutional Democracy'</a>, Maris Köpcke questions the internal consistency of the account of normative powers in the book and its compatibility with the theory of constitutional democracy.</p> <p>Finally, in '<a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10021">What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?</a>' Graziella Romeo takes the cue from constitutionalism as 'legal otherness' to highlight the role of traditions and contingency in constitutional thinking.</p> <p>I attempt to engage with the many criticisms and comments in my reply, <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10375">'Making and re-making the theory of constitutional democracy: further observations</a>', where I develop further several of the theses in TMCD.</p> <p>The entire symposium can be found <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9999">here</a> and the book can be freely downloaded <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4562656">here</a>. /end</p> Mon, 07 Oct 2024 10:45:14 GMT https://blue.feedland.org/?item=653197 https://blue.feedland.org/?item=653197 A new symposium on my OA book 'The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law' (Hart '22) is now published online first on Revus. I'm grateful to the editors for hosting it and to the contributors for their fantastic comments. A brief thread: In '[The State and legal otherness'](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10044), Donald Bello Hutt wonders if my criticism of Hobbes is misguided and discusses the relationship between the idea of the state and that of the rule of law. Is it an essential relationship? In ['Legal constitutionalism and the Ius/Lex distinction](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10130)', Mathieu Carpentier engages with the distinction between lex and ius I develop in TMCD and wonders if it runs against the account of constitutionalism I develop therein. In ['Normative power and The Making of Constitutional Democracy'](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9898), Maris Köpcke questions the internal consistency of the account of normative powers in the book and its compatibility with the theory of constitutional democracy. Finally, in '[What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10021)' Graziella Romeo takes the cue from constitutionalism as 'legal otherness' to highlight the role of traditions and contingency in constitutional thinking. I attempt to engage with the many criticisms and comments in my reply, ['Making and re-making the theory of constitutional democracy: further observations](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10375)', where I develop further several of the theses in TMCD. The entire symposium can be found [here](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9999) and the book can be freely downloaded [here](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4562656). /end <p>A new symposium on my OA book 'The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law' (Hart '22) is now published online first on Revus. I'm grateful to the editors for hosting it and to the contributors for their fantastic comments. A brief thread:</p> <p>In '<a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10044">The State and legal otherness'</a>, Donald Bello Hutt wonders if my criticism of Hobbes is misguided and discusses the relationship between the idea of the state and that of the rule of law. Is it an essential relationship?</p> <p>In <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10130">'Legal constitutionalism and the Ius/Lex distinction</a>', Mathieu Carpentier engages with the distinction between lex and ius I develop in TMCD and wonders if it runs against the account of constitutionalism I develop therein.</p> <p>In <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9898">'Normative power and The Making of Constitutional Democracy'</a>, Maris Köpcke questions the internal consistency of the account of normative powers in the book and its compatibility with the theory of constitutional democracy.</p> <p>Finally, in '<a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10021">What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?</a>' Graziella Romeo takes the cue from constitutionalism as 'legal otherness' to highlight the role of traditions and contingency in constitutional thinking.</p> <p>I attempt to engage with the many criticisms and comments in my reply, <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10375">'Making and re-making the theory of constitutional democracy: further observations</a>', where I develop further several of the theses in TMCD.</p> <p>The entire symposium can be found <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9999">here</a> and the book can be freely downloaded <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4562656">here</a>. /end</p> Sun, 06 Oct 2024 22:51:12 GMT https://blue.feedland.org/?item=652631 https://blue.feedland.org/?item=652631 A new symposium on my OA book 'The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law' (Hart '22) is now published online first on Revus. I'm grateful to the editors for hosting it and to the contributors for their fantastic comments. A brief thread: In '[The State and legal otherness'](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10044), Donald Bello Hutt wonders if my criticism of Hobbes is misguided and discusses the relationship between the idea of the state and that of the rule of law. Is it an essential relationship? In ['Legal constitutionalism and the Ius/Lex distinction](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10130)', Mathieu Carpentier engages with the distinction between lex and ius I develop in TMCD and wonders if it runs against the account of constitutionalism I develop therein. In ['Normative power and The Making of Constitutional Democracy'](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9898), Maris Köpcke questions the internal consistency of the account of normative powers in the book and its compatibility with the theory of constitutional democracy. Finally, in '[What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10021)' Graziella Romeo takes the cue from constitutionalism as 'legal otherness' to highlight the role of traditions and contingency in constitutional thinking. I attempt to engage with the many criticisms and comments in my reply, ['Making and re-making the theory of constitutional democracy: further observations](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10375)', where I develop further several of the theses in TMCD. The entire symposium can be found [here](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9999) and the book can be freely downloaded [here](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4562656). /end <p>A new symposium on my OA book 'The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law' (Hart '22) is now published online first on Revus. I'm grateful to the editors for hosting it and to the contributors for their fantastic comments. A brief thread:</p> <p>In '<a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10044">The State and legal otherness'</a>, Donald Bello Hutt wonders if my criticism of Hobbes is misguided and discusses the relationship between the idea of the state and that of the rule of law. Is it an essential relationship?</p> <p>In <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10130">'Legal constitutionalism and the Ius/Lex distinction</a>', Mathieu Carpentier engages with the distinction between lex and ius I develop in TMCD and wonders if it runs against the account of constitutionalism I develop therein.</p> <p>In <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9898">'Normative power and The Making of Constitutional Democracy'</a>, Maris Köpcke questions the internal consistency of the account of normative powers in the book and its compatibility with the theory of constitutional democracy.</p> <p>Finally, in '<a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10021">What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?</a>' Graziella Romeo takes the cue from constitutionalism as 'legal otherness' to highlight the role of traditions and contingency in constitutional thinking.</p> <p>I attempt to engage with the many criticisms and comments in my reply, <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10375">'Making and re-making the theory of constitutional democracy: further observations</a>', where I develop further several of the theses in TMCD.</p> <p>The entire symposium can be found <a href="https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9999">here</a> and the book can be freely downloaded <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4562656">here</a>. /end</p> Sun, 06 Oct 2024 22:48:55 GMT https://blue.feedland.org/?item=652618 https://blue.feedland.org/?item=652618 A new symposium on my OA book 'The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law' (Hart '22) is now published online first on Revus. I'm grateful to the editors for hosting it and to the contributors for their fantastic comments. A brief thread: In '[The State and legal otherness'](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10044), Donald Bello Hutt wonders if my criticism of Hobbes is misguided and discusses the relationship between the idea of the state and that of the rule of law. Is it an essential relationship? In ['Legal constitutionalism and the Ius/Lex distinction](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10130)', Mathieu Carpentier engages with the distinction between lex and ius I develop in TMCD and wonders if it runs against the account of constitutionalism I develop therein. In ['Normative power and The Making of Constitutional Democracy'](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9898), Maris Köpcke questions the internal consistency of the account of normative powers in the book and its compatibility with the theory of constitutional democracy. Finally, in '[What do we mean by constitutional supremacy?](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10021)' Graziella Romeo takes the cue from constitutionalism as 'legal otherness' to highlight the role of traditions and contingency in constitutional thinking. I attempt to engage with the many criticisms and comments in my reply, ['Making and re-making the theory of constitutional democracy: further observations](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/10375)', where I develop further several of the theses in TMCD. The entire symposium can be found [here](https://journals.openedition.org/revus/9999) and the book can be freely downloaded [here](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4562656). /end