My Feed

Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:08:17 GMT

1. Mass shootings are not random or isolated—they are a direct product of patriarchal capitalism.

2. Patriarchy glorifies male aggression, entitlement, and violence, creating a culture where men are conditioned to use force to assert dominance.

3. Capitalism fuels alienation, competition, and the erosion of community, intensifying feelings of inadequacy and rage among men who feel they’ve lost status.

4. The intersection of patriarchy and capitalism breeds environments where men believe violence is a legitimate way to reclaim power and control.

5. Misogyny, domestic abuse, and mass shootings are all symptoms of the same toxic system: patriarchal capitalism.

6. The incel movement and online hate communities are not fringe—they are logical outcomes of a society that commodifies women and glorifies male dominance.

7. Every mass shooting is a structural failure, not an individual anomaly. Patriarchal capitalism makes these tragedies inevitable.

8. If we want to end mass shootings, we must dismantle the systems of patriarchy and capitalism that make them possible.

Tue, 18 Feb 2025 03:01:11 GMT

## The Methods of Nonviolent Protest and Persuasion

FORMAL STATEMENTS: 1. Public Speeches, 2. Letters of opposition or support, 3. Declarations by organizations and institutions, 4. Signed public statements, 5. Declarations of indictment and intention, 6. Group or mass petitions.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH A WIDER AUDIENCE: 7. Slogans, caricatures, and symbols, 8. Banners, posters, and displayed communications, 9. Leaflets, pamphlets, and books, 10. Newspapers and journals, 11. Records, radio, and television, 12. Skywriting and earthwriting

GROUP REPRESENTATIONS: 13. Deputations, 14. Mock awards, 15. Group lobbying, 16. Picketing, 17. Mock elections

SYMBOLIC PUBLIC ACTS: 18. Displays of flags and symbolic colors, 19. Wearing of symbols, 20. Prayer and worship, 21. Delivering symbolic objects, 22. Protest disrobings, 23. Destruction of own property, 24. Symbolic lights, 25. Displays of portraits, 26. Paint as protest, 27. New signs and names, 28. Symbolic sounds, 29. Symbolic reclamations, 30. Rude gestures

PRESSURES ON INDIVIDUALS: 31. “Haunting” officials, 32. Taunting officials, 33. Fraternization, 34. Vigils

DRAMA AND MUSIC: 35. Humorous skits and pranks, 36. Performances of plays and music, 37. Singing

PROCESSIONS: 38. Marches, 39. Parades, 40. Religious processions, 41. Pilgrimages, 42. Motorcades

HONORING THE DEAD: 43. Political mourning, 44. Mock funerals, 45. Demonstrative funerals, 46. Homage at burial places

PUBLIC ASSEMBLIES: 47. Assemblies of protest or support, 48. Protest meetings, 49. Camouflaged meetings of protest, 50. Teach-ins

WITHDRAWAL AND RENUNCIATION: 51. Walk-outs, 52. Silence, 53. Renouncing honors, 54. Turning one’s back

## The Methods of Social Noncooperation

OSTRACISM OF PERSONS: 55. Social boycott, 56. Selective social boycott, 57. Lysistratic nonaction, 58. Excommunication, 59. Interdict

NONCOOPERATION WITH SOCIAL EVENTS: CUSTOMS, AND INSTITUTIONS: 60. Suspension of social and sports activities, 61. Boycott of social affairs, 62. Student strike, 63. Social disobedience, 64. Withdrawal from social institutions

WITHDRAWAL FROM THE SOCIAL SYSTEM: 65. Stay-at-home, 66. Total personal noncooperation, 67. “Flight” of workers, 68. Sanctuary, 69. Collective disappearance, 70. Protest emigration (hijrat)

## The Methods of Economic Noncooperation (Economic Boycotts)

ACTIONS BY CONSUMERS: 71. Consumers’ boycott, 72. Nonconsumption of boycotted goods, 73. Policy of austerity, 74. Rent withholding, 75. Refusal to rent, 76. National consumers’ boycott, 77. International consumers’ boycott

ACTION BY WORKERS AND PRODUCERS: 78. Workmen’s boycott, 79. Producers’ boycott

ACTION BY MIDDLEMEN: 80. Suppliers’ and handlers’ boycott

ACTION BY OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT: 81. Traders’ boycott, 82. Refusal to let or sell property, 83. Lockout, 84. Refusal of industrial assistance, 85. Merchants’ “general strike”

ACTION BY HOLDERS OF FINANCIAL RESOURCES: 86. Withdrawal of bank deposits, 87. Refusal to pay fees, dues, and assessments, 88. Refusal to pay debts or interest, 89. Severance of funds and credit, 90. Revenue refusal, 91. Refusal of a government’s money

ACTION BY GOVERNMENTS: 92. Domestic embargo, 93. Blacklisting of traders, 94. International sellers’ embargo, 95. International buyers’ embargo, 96. International trade embargo

## The Methods of Economic Noncooperation (The Strike)

SYMBOLIC STRIKES: 97. Protest strike, 98. Quickie walkout (lightning strike)

AGRICULTURAL STRIKES: 99. Peasant strike, 100. Farm Workers’ strike

STRIKES BY SPECIAL GROUPS: 101. Refusal of impressed labor, 102. Prisoners’ strike, 103. Craft strike, 104. Professional strike

ORDINARY INDUSTRIAL STRIKES: 105. Establishment strike, 106. Industry strike, 107. Sympathetic strike

RESTRICTED STRIKES: 108. Detailed strike, 109. Bumper strike, 110. Slowdown strike, 111. Working-to-rule strike, 112. Reporting “sick” (sick-in), 113. Strike by resignation, 114. Limited strike, 115. Selective strike

MULTI-INDUSTRY STRIKES: 116. Generalized strike, 117. General strike

COMBINATION OF STRIKES AND ECONOMIC CLOSURES: 118. Hartal, 119. Economic shutdown

## The Methods of Political Noncooperation

REJECTION OF AUTHORITY: 120. Withholding or withdrawal of allegiance, 121. Refusal of public support, 122. Literature and speeches advocating resistance

CITIZENS’ NONCOOPERATION WITH GOVERNMENT: 123. Boycott of legislative bodies, 124. Boycott of elections, 125. Boycott of government employment and positions, 126. Boycott of government depts., agencies, and other bodies, 127. Withdrawal from government educational institutions, 128. Boycott of government-supported organizations, 129. Refusal of assistance to enforcement agents, 130. Removal of own signs and placemarks, 131. Refusal to accept appointed officials, 132. Refusal to dissolve existing institutions

CITIZENS’ ALTERNATIVES TO OBEDIENCE: 133. Reluctant and slow compliance, 134. Nonobedience in absence of direct supervision, 135. Popular nonobedience, 136. Disguised disobedience, 137. Refusal of an assemblage or meeting to disperse, 138. Sitdown, 139. Noncooperation with conscription and deportation, 140. Hiding, escape, and false identities, 141. Civil disobedience of “illegitimate” laws

ACTION BY GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL: 142. Selective refusal of assistance by government aides, 143. Blocking of lines of command and information, 144. Stalling and obstruction, 145. General administrative noncooperation, 146. Judicial noncooperation, 147. Deliberate inefficiency and selective noncooperation by enforcement agents, 148. Mutiny

DOMESTIC GOVERNMENTAL ACTION: 149. Quasi-legal evasions and delays, 150. Noncooperation by constituent governmental units

INTERNATIONAL GOVERNMENTAL ACTION: 151. Changes in diplomatic and other representations, 152. Delay and cancellation of diplomatic events, 153. Withholding of diplomatic recognition, 154. Severance of diplomatic relations, 155. Withdrawal from international organizations, 156. Refusal of membership in international bodies, 157. Expulsion from international organizations

## The Methods of Nonviolent Intervention

PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTION: 158. Self-exposure to the elements, 159. The fast a) Fast of moral pressure; b) Hunger strike; c) Satyagrahic fast, 160. Reverse trial, 161. Nonviolent harassment

PHYSICAL INTERVENTION: 162. Sit-in, 163. Stand-in, 164. Ride-in, 165. Wade-in, 166. Mill-in, 167. Pray-in, 168. Nonviolent raids, 169. Nonviolent air raids, 170. Nonviolent invasion, 171. Nonviolent interjection, 172. Nonviolent obstruction, 173. Nonviolent occupation

SOCIAL INTERVENTION: 174. Establishing new social patterns, 175. Overloading of facilities, 176. Stall-in, 177. Speak-in, 178. Guerrilla theater, 179. Alternative social institutions, 180. Alternative communication system

ECONOMIC INTERVENTION: 181. Reverse strike, 182. Stay-in strike, 183. Nonviolent land seizure, 184. Defiance of blockades, 185. Politically motivated counterfeiting, 186. Preclusive purchasing, 187. Seizure of assets, 188. Dumping, 189. Selective patronage, 190. Alternative markets, 191. Alternative transportation systems, 192. Alternative economic institutions

POLITICAL INTERVENTION: 193. Overloading of administrative systems, 194. Disclosing identities of secret agents, 195. Seeking imprisonment, 196. Civil disobedience of “neutral” laws, 197. Work-on without collaboration, 198. Dual sovereignty and parallel government

Wed, 05 Feb 2025 16:04:38 GMT

> A parade as a demonstration of protest or persuasion involves a group of people walking in an organized manner as a means of calling attention to their grievance or point of view.

The parade is distinguished from the march in that, although it has a point of termination, that point is not of intrinsic significance to the demonstration. Banners, leaflets, posters, and the like may or not be used in conjunction with the parade.

This type of demonstration may or may not be accompanied by bands providing music and by other types of activities.

The first parade for woman suffrage in Washington, D.C., was held in 1913 by the National American Woman Suffrage Association, with between eight thousand and ten thousand participants, including many senators and representatives with their wives.

As it dispersed, the parades were assaulted by opponents, which resulted in a major press and political uproar.

Parades were often used during the Indian nonviolent struggles; for example, the parades of Muslims in Bombay on June 3, 1930, to demonstrate their support for the civil resistance movement.

An example from the West is the four-hour protest parade in London on November 4, 1956, against the invasion of Egypt.

Six thousand supporters of the People's United Party paraded through the streets of Belize on August 24, 1958, in support of their demand for immediate self-government for British Honduras.

In South Africa, in June 1957, several thousand professors, lecturers and students at Capetown University paraded through the streets of Capetown in protest against the Universities' Apartheid Bill, which made multiracial university education illegal in the country.

There are many possible variations on the parade. For example, during the boycott of tea (as part of the nonimportation campaign against the Townshend duties)

the merchants of Marblehead, in the Province of Massachusetts Bay, on October 19, 1769 ceremoniously carted through the streets a chest of tea purchased from a Boston importer and then returned it to its starting point in Boston.

During the 1960 Japanese campaign against the revision of the United States-Japanese Security Pact, the student group Zengakuren developed other variations of the parade:

"Zig-zag demonstration (snake-like parade), French style of demonstration (hand-in-hand parade), centripetal demonstration (parades starting from many points and finally centralizing at the Center . . ,"

(Gene Sharp, Methods of Nonviolent Action)

Wed, 05 Feb 2025 15:57:38 GMT

In Oriente province of Cuba in late 1956, during the Batista regime, the bodies of twenty-nine Cuban youths are reported to have been delivered, badly mutilated, as government reprisals for the November uprising. Later there were other murders and countermurders in Santiago.

On January 2, 1957, soldiers in Santiago seized William Soler, a fourteen-year-old boy; his badly tortured body was dumped in an empty lot the next night. Robert Taber writes:

"At ten o'clock in the morning [of January 4], some forty women dressed in black left the Church of Dolores . . . and moved in slow procession, praying in unison and fingering their rosaries, down Calle Aguilera ...

At their head marched the mother of William Soler, and with her the mothers of other youths slain by police and soldiers . . . Over their heads they carried a large white banner with the black inscription: Cesen los asesinatos de nuestros hijos. (Stop the murder of our sons.)"

As they moved on past the park and through the shopping district, other women joined them. There were two hundred by the time they had passed the first block, then eight hundred, then a thousand.

At every step more women left the shops to join the procession, pressing slowly forward through the narrow, cobbled street.

A few policemen stood by, helpless, at the intersections. Men watched from the doorways and many wept with shame as the women passed by, the only soundonly sound of ured litany and the funereal tapping of their heels.

At one intersection, a jeep load of soldiers suddenly appeared, training a machine gun on the procession, blocking the way. The women waited, silently. The demonstration continued to grow until it overflowed into nearby streets, blocking all traffic.

When the soldiers tried to break up the manifestation, pushing their way into the dense crowd, the women simply opened aisles for them to pass through, and then closed ranks again.

The mothers refused to be provoked into any overt act of physical resistance, but stood in quiet dignity until the soldiers gave up their futile efforts and, shamefaced, turned away.

Then the women began, still silently, to disperse. Part of the procession continued on to the city hall and to the offices of several newspapers to leave petitions, demanding an end of the terror and the restoration of civil law. Then these women, too, went quietly home.

The mothers' protest march in Santiago had significance because it was the first public act to signal the beginning of organized civic resistance on a broad and effective scale in Cuba, under the aegis of the fide lis ta movement.

(Gene Sharp, Methods of Nonviolent Action)

Wed, 22 Jan 2025 16:30:57 GMT

Fascist regimes have historically utilized deniable unofficial militia violence as a strategic tool to consolidate power and suppress opposition.

This approach often involves the use of paramilitary groups that operate outside formal state structures, allowing the regime to maintain plausible deniability while instilling fear among opponents and the general populace.

Fascist movements, such as Mussolini's Blackshirts (Squadrismo) in Italy, relied on organized militia groups that conducted violent raids against political adversaries, particularly leftists.

These squads were composed of local supporters who engaged in acts of intimidation, property destruction, and physical assaults, effectively undermining leftist activism and consolidating fascist influence in local areas.

The violence employed by these militias was not merely physical but also psychological. By creating an atmosphere of fear and unpredictability, fascists could deter opposition without needing to engage in direct confrontations with state forces.

This tactic allowed them to dismantle democratic structures and silence dissent through terror.

While these militias operated independently, they often received tacit approval or direct support from state authorities.

This relationship enabled fascist leaders to distance themselves from the violence when politically expedient while simultaneously benefiting from the chaos created by these groups.

For instance, Mussolini initially encouraged squadristi violence to eliminate socialist threats but later sought to control and integrate these militias into the state apparatus.

The rise of fascism in the early 20th century is marked by a systematic use of violence as a political tool. In Italy, for example, the Blackshirts engaged in violent confrontations with socialists and trade unionists, which facilitated Mussolini's ascent to power.

The Blackshirts' actions were characterized by brutal tactics such as beatings, arson, and public intimidation, which not only targeted individuals but also aimed to disrupt organized labor movements and leftist political activities.

In Germany, similar tactics were employed by Hitler's Brownshirts (SA), who used street violence against communists and other perceived enemies of the Nazi Party.

Fascist regimes across Europe adopted militia violence as a core component of their political strategy.

The legacy of fascist militia violence continues to resonate in modern political contexts where right-wing movements may employ similar strategies.

Contemporary parallels can be drawn with militia groups that operate within and without law enforcement frameworks, echoing historical fascist practices of using unofficial violence to achieve political ends.

Fascist militias echo groups like the Tsarist Black Hundreds and the Ku Klux Klan in their use of unofficial, state-tolerated violence to suppress opposition and enforce social hierarchies.

The Black Hundreds, active in early 20th-century Russia, carried out pogroms targeting Jews and revolutionaries with tacit government approval, aiming to deflect unrest away from the monarchy.

Similarly, the KKK used lynchings and terror to uphold white supremacy, often with local authorities turning a blind eye. Both groups inspired fear, reinforced societal divisions, and served as tools for reactionary political agendas.

By absolving individuals convicted of seditious conspiracy for the January 6 Capitol attack, Trump signals approval of extralegal violence as a political tool.

This move mirrors historical patterns where authoritarian-leaning leaders leverage paramilitary groups to intimidate opponents while maintaining plausible deniability.

The pardons suggest a willingness within Trump's political faction to normalize or even weaponize such groups to advance their agenda, undermining democratic norms and accountability.

The Proud Boys, a far-right neo-fascist organization, have a long history of political violence and extremist activity. Founded in 2016, the group promotes "Western chauvinism" and has engaged in violent clashes at protests, often targeting left-wing activists.

Proud Boys played a prominent role in the January 6 Capitol attack, with leaders like Enrique Tarrio convicted of seditious conspiracy for planning to disrupt the certification of the 2020 election results.

Trump's pardoning of Proud Boys members, including Tarrio, signals tacit approval of their actions and aligns with historical patterns of leveraging paramilitary violence for political purposes.

The Proud Boys' glorification of violence, such as the viral promotion of street fights, serves as both a recruitment tool and a means to intimidate opponents.

MAGA's support of groups like the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and Christian nationalist organizations, along with the administration's ties to white supremacist figures and ideologies, demonstrate a clear alignment with fascist movements that wield violence to undermine democracy.

Wed, 22 Jan 2025 16:22:34 GMT