https://blue.feedland.org/?river=http://data.feedland.org/blue/feeds/@gmacdonalduoft.bsky.social.xml Wed, 10 Jan 2024 20:47:51 GMT feedland v0.6.43 https://cyber.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html Wed, 10 Jan 2024 20:47:50 GMT http://rpc.rsscloud.io:5337/pleaseNotify Wed, January 10, 2024 3:47 PM EST <p>Last semester, I taught a graduate course on singlehood for the first time. I thought it might be worth making a thread highlighting some outstanding papers from the course.</p> <p>Stein is a legend in singlehood research, and imho his 1978 paper still stands up as balanced and insightful. <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1300/J002v01n04%5C_01">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1300/J002v01n04\_01</a></p> <p>Bühler et al.&#39;s paper presents a meta anlaysis that suggests entering relationships increases life satisfaction (on average, for those so motivated to get into rels). <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/08902070231190219">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/08902070231190219</a></p> <p>I love qualitative work that really listens to the participants, and Moorman&#39;s paper does just that. Also, her positionality statement was a big hit with the students. <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0361684320939070">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0361684320939070</a></p> <p>We may (or may not) be watching the rise of singlehood as an identity in real time, so using existing theory about identity to understand this movement seems really important to me. <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10463283.2023.2241937">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10463283.2023.2241937</a></p> <p>A number of non-Western singlehood researchers think Western singlehood research is too centered on autonomy. Yoshida&#39;s paper is a great example of a different perspective. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jftr.12493">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jftr.12493</a></p> <p>Hostetler&#39;s paper was transformative for me in thinking about the role of secondary coping as part of singlehood. <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00918360902821486">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00918360902821486</a></p> <p>Again, qualitative work that really listens well to participants is something I appreciate. Wilkinson et al. do that in this paper. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1748-8583.12181">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1748-8583.12181</a></p> Wed, 10 Jan 2024 20:47:51 GMT https://blue.feedland.org/?item=256383 https://blue.feedland.org/?item=256383 Last semester, I taught a graduate course on singlehood for the first time. I thought it might be worth making a thread highlighting some outstanding papers from the course. Stein is a legend in singlehood research, and imho his 1978 paper still stands up as balanced and insightful. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1300/J002v01n04\_01 Bühler et al.'s paper presents a meta anlaysis that suggests entering relationships increases life satisfaction (on average, for those so motivated to get into rels). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/08902070231190219 I love qualitative work that really listens to the participants, and Moorman's paper does just that. Also, her positionality statement was a big hit with the students. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0361684320939070 We may (or may not) be watching the rise of singlehood as an identity in real time, so using existing theory about identity to understand this movement seems really important to me. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10463283.2023.2241937 A number of non-Western singlehood researchers think Western singlehood research is too centered on autonomy. Yoshida's paper is a great example of a different perspective. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jftr.12493 Hostetler's paper was transformative for me in thinking about the role of secondary coping as part of singlehood. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00918360902821486 Again, qualitative work that really listens well to participants is something I appreciate. Wilkinson et al. do that in this paper. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1748-8583.12181 <p>Last semester, I taught a graduate course on singlehood for the first time. I thought it might be worth making a thread highlighting some outstanding papers from the course.</p> <p>Stein is a legend in singlehood research, and imho his 1978 paper still stands up as balanced and insightful. <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1300/J002v01n04%5C_01">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1300/J002v01n04\_01</a></p> <p>Bühler et al.&#39;s paper presents a meta anlaysis that suggests entering relationships increases life satisfaction (on average, for those so motivated to get into rels). <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/08902070231190219">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/08902070231190219</a></p> <p>I love qualitative work that really listens to the participants, and Moorman&#39;s paper does just that. Also, her positionality statement was a big hit with the students. <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0361684320939070">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0361684320939070</a></p> <p>We may (or may not) be watching the rise of singlehood as an identity in real time, so using existing theory about identity to understand this movement seems really important to me. <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10463283.2023.2241937">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10463283.2023.2241937</a></p> <p>A number of non-Western singlehood researchers think Western singlehood research is too centered on autonomy. Yoshida&#39;s paper is a great example of a different perspective. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jftr.12493">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jftr.12493</a></p> <p>Hostetler&#39;s paper was transformative for me in thinking about the role of secondary coping as part of singlehood. <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00918360902821486">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00918360902821486</a></p> <p>Again, qualitative work that really listens well to participants is something I appreciate. Wilkinson et al. do that in this paper. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1748-8583.12181">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1748-8583.12181</a></p> Wed, 10 Jan 2024 20:47:18 GMT https://blue.feedland.org/?item=256382 https://blue.feedland.org/?item=256382 Last semester, I taught a graduate course on singlehood for the first time. I thought it might be worth making a thread highlighting some outstanding papers from the course. Stein is a legend in singlehood research, and imho his 1978 paper still stands up as balanced and insightful. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1300/J002v01n04\_01 Bühler et al.'s paper presents a meta anlaysis that suggests entering relationships increases life satisfaction (on average, for those so motivated to get into rels). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/08902070231190219 I love qualitative work that really listens to the participants, and Moorman's paper does just that. Also, her positionality statement was a big hit with the students. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0361684320939070 We may (or may not) be watching the rise of singlehood as an identity in real time, so using existing theory about identity to understand this movement seems really important to me. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10463283.2023.2241937 A number of non-Western singlehood researchers think Western singlehood research is too centered on autonomy. Yoshida's paper is a great example of a different perspective. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jftr.12493 Hostetler's paper was transformative for me in thinking about the role of secondary coping as part of singlehood. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00918360902821486 Again, qualitative work that really listens well to participants is something I appreciate. Wilkinson et al. do that in this paper. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1748-8583.12181